Are fossil dating methods accuracy west virginia online dating eharmony com

posted by | Leave a comment

Popular presentations of human evolution show a rather smooth transition of fossils leading to modern humans.The impression given is that the dating of the individual fossils in that sequence is accurate enough to establish human evolution as a fact.Evolution places severe demands upon fossils used to support it.A fossil in an evolutionary sequence must have both the proper morphology (shape) to fit that sequence and an appropriate date to justify its position in that sequence.However, because ostrich eggshell is thought to be a rather closed system, it is claimed that items found in association with it can be dated more accurately by the amino-acid-racemization method.The admissions now being made about the dating methods that have been previously used by evolutionists to cover this time period are particularly interesting.

They are the Amud I and Shukbah remains from Israel and the Saint-Cesaire and Arcy-sur-Cure remains from France.Twenty-eight of them (44%) fall within this time gap.Nineteen of the 222 Homo erectus fossil individuals (9% of the total) likewise fall into this time gap.These admissions have profound implications for human evolution.In the Science article on ostrich-eggshell dating,[3] the authors state that many of the dates assigned to human fossils in this 40,000-to-200,000-years ago period based on the older methods were only "provisional," and that all such dating is "uncertain." These are remarkable admissions.

Leave a Reply

Free chat raw sex