Carbon 14 dating christian
Such an assumption presumes that: (1) The rate of cosmic-ray activity has always been the same as it is at present; (2) The magnetic field of the earth has always been the same as it is now; and (3) The nature of the upper atmosphere has always been the same as now.
In addition to the criticisms raised by Woods concerning the level of C-14 and the constant influx of cosmic radiation in the atmosphere, Harris argued that it would be virtually impossible to know whether the C-14 sample was free of foreign carbon-containing material.
One group has been made up of fundamentalist evangelicals, who accepted the global effect of Noah's flood and a young earth and rejected radioactive dates.
The other, non-literalist group of evangelicals accepted some kinds of evolutionary uniformitarian hypotheses and radioactive dating.
One of the most interesting and controversial defenses of a young earth was raised by Robert V.
In his 1923 book The New Geology and in other publications, George Mc Cready Price, an Adventist geologist, framed the so-called "flood geology" theory, which greatly influenced fundamentalist evangelicals as well as the Adventist scholars.However, this is the case only if certain conditions are met.First, the rate of the formation and decay of C-14 has always been the same.adiocarbon (C-14) dating has several implications for Christianity, particularly in terms of the interpretation of the first part of Genesis.Since its advent in the mid-20th century, it has been one of the central topics in the creation-evolution controversy.