Updating the beers criteria
Of these potentially inappropriate drugs, 66 were considered by the panel to have adverse outcomes of high severity.Conclusions: This study is an important update of previously established criteria that have been widely used and cited.Tools like the AGS Beers Criteria can do much to support medication use that is safe, effective, and responsive to each person’s health needs.” The expert panel convened by the AGS reviewed more than 6,700 clinical trials and research studies from a pool of more than 20,000 articles published since the last AGS Beers Criteria update in 2012.The panel’s revisions inform specific (though not exhaustive) lists of medications that may be harmful to older adults.Added Donna Fick, Ph D, RN, GCNS-BC, FGSA, FAAN, expert panel co-chair: “The AGS Beers Criteria offer guidance to clinicians and the public for talking about medications with risks that may outweigh benefits.It’s important to remember that many of these medications are considered only in certain circumstances and for certain people.
2,7,8 If medication-related problems were ranked as a disease by cause of death, it would be the fifth leading cause of death in the United States.Among these core tenets, expert panelists reiterated that: The AGS issued its first revision to the Beers Criteria in 2012, one year after assuming responsibility for the resource.Since that time, the AGS Beers Criteria have played a central role in high-quality care for older adults, influencing everything from research and professional education to care quality measures and health policy decisions. The purpose of this initiative was to revise and update the Beers criteria for potentially inappropriate medication use in adults 65 years and older in the United States. Beers, MD Background: Medication toxic effects and drugrelated problems can have profound medical and safety consequences for older adults and economically affect the health care system.